Talk:Confield

Confield has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 30, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Electronic music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Confield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041223142839/http://www.warprecords.com/ography/release.php?cat=WARP128 to http://www.warprecords.com/ography/release.php?cat=WARP128

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:01, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Confield/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Rambley (talk · contribs) 18:01, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 00:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC) I'll take this[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Lead

Image needs alt text

Done Rambley (talk) 01:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Background

How is "Lego Feet" self titled?

Because it is.^[1]^[2] Rambley (talk) 01:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify that the name of the duo at the time was Lego feet Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 01:49, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After the release of the self-titled album Lego Feet in 1991, their first project under the Autechre name would come with the release of Cavity Job. This kind of implies this already; it already states their first project under Autechre was Cavity Job. It also mentions Lego Feet is self-titled already, telling the reader that was the former name the duo went under. I've went ahead and added a note for Cavity Job being released later to clear up any other confusion, though. Rambley (talk) 01:55, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Section seems out of scope being more about the band then the album

It's common for articles to do this for readers who have no idea who the band is. See MOS:ALBUM or for a live example, see Selected Ambient Works Volume II. Rambley (talk) 01:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Production

Looks good

Composition

Only "electronic" is linked after its first mention. Everything else in the article only gets one link.

Assuming you mean wikilinks, I've removed that second link. Rambley (talk) 01:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

Note that metacritic uses a weighted average

"Average" already wikilinks to weighted averages. If you still want it to specifically say this, I can add it. Rambley (talk) 01:23, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That would be prefered because not every reader will click through Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 01:49, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Rambley (talk) 01:58, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing

References

Ref 1, link to Sound on Sound for consistency

Done Rambley (talk) 01:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 13, cant find Malcolm Seymour III name anywhere on the review

Weirdly not on the current version, but see here. Rambley (talk) 01:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 13, link Pitchfork for consistency

Done Rambley (talk) 01:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 22, uses MDY date formatting while it should use DMY

Are you talking about the Gantz Graf review? Because it does use DMY formatting. So do the refs around it. Maybe I'm missing something? Rambley (talk) 01:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

if you look at it editing veiw it did I have fixed it as its a relatively small thing Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 01:51, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 24, Autechre shouldnt be capitalized in the title

Done Rambley (talk) 01:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Igloo Magazine reliable?

Changed to a better source. Rambley (talk) 01:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spot checks don't turn up anything

Misc

A few MOS:DASH violations but I fixed with a script

Earwig flags less then 1 percent similarity

Overall

@Rambley: Thats what I found ping me when done Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 01:11, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@OlifanofmrTennant Fixed what I can, a couple of comments to note though. Rambley (talk) 01:30, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

^ Segal, Dave; Zurko, Nick. "The Stranger's Alternative to Pitchfork's 50 Best IDM Albums List". The Stranger. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Robb, John (8 April 2010). "Beyond The Radar: Autechre Interviewed". The Quietus. Retrieved 30 January 2025.

[1] Segal, Dave; Zurko, Nick. "The Stranger's Alternative to Pitchfork's 50 Best IDM Albums List". The Stranger. Retrieved 30 January 2025.

[2] Robb, John (8 April 2010). "Beyond The Radar: Autechre Interviewed". The Quietus. Retrieved 30 January 2025.

[1]

[2]